Validity and reliability evidence for assessing holland's career types

5Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Professional interests are a synthesis of personal characteristics and function as a guiding factor for one's career choice. This study shows evidence of validity and reliability for the interpretation of the scores of a measure of career types. The responses of 1,265 high school students to 154 items from the Escala de Avaliação dos Tipos Profissionais de Holland (ATPH) [Assessment Scale of Holland's Career Types] were used. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses showed that the six-factor structure is appropriate and consistent to represent the RIASEC types. Evidence of convergent-discriminant validity of parcels of items was demonstrated to represent the latent factors of the ATPH Scale. Results of multidimensional analysis and phi correlation phi partially confirmed the hypothesis of circularity and congruence among the career types, which are organized in the acronym RASIEC. The implications of these results and study limitations are discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Meireles, E., & Primi, R. (2015). Validity and reliability evidence for assessing holland’s career types. Paideia, 25(62), 307–315. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-43272562201504

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free