Partial protection of seasonal trivalent inactivated vaccine against novel pandemic influenza A/H1N1 2009: Case-control study in Mexico City

137Citations
Citations of this article
113Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the association of 2008-9 seasonal trivalent inactivated vaccine with cases of influenza A/H1N1 during the epidemic in Mexico. Design: Frequency matched case-control study. Setting: Specialty hospital in Mexico City, March to May 2009. Participants: 60 patients with laboratory confirmed influenza A/H1N1 and 180 controls with other diseases (not influenza-like illness or pneumonia) living in Mexico City or the State of Mexico and matched for age and socioeconomic status. Main outcome measures: Odds ratio and effectiveness of trivalent inactivated vaccine against influenza A/H1N1. Results: Cases were more likely than controls to be admitted to hospital, undergo invasive mechanical ventilation, and die. Controls were more likely than cases to have chronic conditions that conferred a higher risk of influenza related complications. In the multivariate model, influenza A/H1N1 was independently associated with trivalent inactivated vaccine (odds ratio 0.27, 95% confidence interval 0.11 to 0.66) and underlying conditions (0.15, 0.08 to 0.30). Vaccine effectiveness was 73% (95% confidence interval 34% to 89%). None of the eight vaccinated cases died. Conclusions: Preliminary evidence suggests some protection from the 2008-9 trivalent inactivated vaccine against pandemic influenza A/H1N1 2009, particularly severe forms of the disease, diagnosed in a specialty hospital during the influenza epidemic in Mexico City.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Garcia-Garcia, L., Valdespino-Gómez, J. L., Lazcano-Ponce, E., Jimenez-Corona, A., Higuera-Iglesias, A., Cruz-Hervert, P., … Hernandez-Avila, M. (2009). Partial protection of seasonal trivalent inactivated vaccine against novel pandemic influenza A/H1N1 2009: Case-control study in Mexico City. BMJ (Online), 339(7725), 847. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b3928

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free