Change in self-rated general health is associated with perceived illness burden: A 1-year follow up of patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes Disease epidemiology - Chronic

7Citations
Citations of this article
61Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Diabetic patients' lifestyle adaptations to improve glycaemic control are not always followed by improvements in self-rated general health (SRH). The perceived impact of diabetes on patients' daily lives may influence changes in their SRH. This paper examines the association of illness severity, treatment, behavioural, and coping-related factors with changes in SRH from diagnosis of type 2 diabetes until one year later, in a population-based sample of 599 patients aged 40 years or over who were treated in general practice. Methods: Change in SRH was estimated by a cumulative probit model with the inclusion of covariates related to SRH (e.g. illness severity at diagnosis, behaviour, treatment, and the perceived impact of diabetes on patients' daily lives one year later). Results: At diagnosis, 11.6% of patients reported very good, 35.1% good, 44.6% fair and 8.5% poor SRH. Physical inactivity, many diabetes-related symptoms, and cardiovascular disease were related to lower SRH ratings. On average SRH improved by 0.46 (95% CI: 0.37; 0.55) during the first year after diagnosis without inclusion of covariates. Mental and practical illness burden was the only factor associated with change in SRH, independent of patients' diabetes severity and medical treatment (p = 0.03, multivariate analysis). Compared to otherwise similar patients without illness burden, increase in SRH was marginally smaller among patients who expressed minor illness burden, but much smaller among patients with more pronounced illness burden. Conclusions: Much as one would expect, many patients increased their SRH during the first year after diabetes diagnosis. This increase in SRH was not associated with indicators of illness severity or factors reflecting socio-demographic circumstances, but patients experiencing illness burden had a smaller increase than those who reported no illness burden. We suggest that during the diabetes consultation, general practitioners explore further how patients manage their illness burden. We further suggest that diabetes guidelines extend their current focus on clinical and social aspects of diabetes to include questions on patient's perceived illness burden and SRH.

References Powered by Scopus

What is self-rated health and why does it predict mortality? Towards a unified conceptual model

1845Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The sociology of chronic illness: a review of research and prospects

683Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

What do global self-rated health items measure?

560Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Diagnostic labelling influences self-rated health. A prospective cohort study: The HUNT study, Norway

41Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A simple self-report health assessment questionnaire to identify oral diseases

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A competing-risk-based score for predicting twenty-year risk of incident diabetes: the Beijing Longitudinal Study of Ageing study

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nielsen, A. B. S., Jensen, P., Gannik, D., Reventlow, S., Hollnagel, H., & Olivarius, N. D. F. (2015). Change in self-rated general health is associated with perceived illness burden: A 1-year follow up of patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes Disease epidemiology - Chronic. BMC Public Health, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1790-6

Readers over time

‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 26

68%

Researcher 8

21%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

8%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 20

54%

Nursing and Health Professions 10

27%

Social Sciences 4

11%

Psychology 3

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0