IDH Inhibitors and Immunotherapy for Biliary Tract Cancer: A Marriage of Convenience?

10Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Systemic treatments have traditionally reported limited efficacy for biliary tract cancer (BTC), and although targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors have been found to play an increasingly important role in treatment, several questions remain unanswered, including the identification of biomarkers of response. The tumor microenvironment (TME) has recently attracted the attention of the BTC medical community, and is currently being studied due to its potential role in modulating response and resistance to systemic therapies, including immunotherapy. In this perspective article, we discuss available evidence regarding the interplay between TME, IDH inhibitors, and immunotherapy, providing rationale for the design of future clinical trials.

References Powered by Scopus

Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer

3566Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Glioma groups based on 1p/19q, IDH, and TERT promoter mutations in tumors

1641Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cholangiocarcinoma 2020: the next horizon in mechanisms and management

1618Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Immunotherapy in Biliary Tract Cancers: Current Standard-of-Care and Emerging Strategies

24Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Clinical management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: surgical approaches and systemic therapies

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma—Where Are We Now and Where Are We Going to?

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brandi, G., & Rizzo, A. (2022). IDH Inhibitors and Immunotherapy for Biliary Tract Cancer: A Marriage of Convenience? International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231810869

Readers over time

‘23‘24‘2501234

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

50%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

25%

Researcher 1

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 3

60%

Sports and Recreations 1

20%

Arts and Humanities 1

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0