If the Body Is Part of Our Discourse, Why Not Let It Speak? Five Critical Perspectives

3Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Of the five perspectives set forth in this essay, four of them specify obstacles that block experiential understandings of emotions. The obstacles in one way and another subvert the living body, whether presenting it as a mere face or as an ahistorical adult body, as an embodied phenomenon or as a brain unattached to a whole-body nervous system. Such accounts bypass the affective dynamics that move through bodies and move them to move. Being true to the truths of experience, the fifth perspective, requires recognition of our infancy and even of our prenatal lives, both of which are tethered to developmental movement. It furthermore requires recognition of affective realties as subject-world relationships and recognition of the dynamic congruency of emotions and movement. In the end, the perspectives lead us to inquire about “the things themselves.”

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sheets-Johnstone, M. (2018). If the Body Is Part of Our Discourse, Why Not Let It Speak? Five Critical Perspectives. In Contributions To Phenomenology (Vol. 97, pp. 83–95). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98657-9_5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free