Understanding negative results in tDCS research: The importance of neural targeting and cortical engagement

8Citations
Citations of this article
68Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In a recent clinical trial we demonstrated the analgesic effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI); however, the positive impact of tDCS on pain was not paralleled by an improvement in quality of life or other related clinical scales. Here we discuss the reasons of such negative results and present hypotheses that could explain why tDCS had no impact on patients' quality of life, while their average level of pain decreased. We will also discuss how these negative findings can help to design future clinical trial using tDCS to treat individuals with chronic pain.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Thibaut, A., Zafonte, R., Morse, L. R., & Fregni, F. (2017, December 12). Understanding negative results in tDCS research: The importance of neural targeting and cortical engagement. Frontiers in Neuroscience. Frontiers Media S.A. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.00707

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free