Assessing response to treatment of exacerbations of bronchiectasis in adults

98Citations
Citations of this article
82Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The present study aimed to assess the effect of intravenous antibiotic therapy on clinical and laboratory end-points in exacerbations of noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis and to determine whether the outcomes were influenced by the pathogenic organism isolated. A prospective cohort study was conducted from November 2006 to March 2008 of exacerbations requiring intravenous antibiotics. End-points included 24-h sputum volume, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), incremental shuttle walk test, qualitative sputum microbiology, white cell count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein (CRP) and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). Exacerbations due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa were compared with exacerbations due to other potential pathogenic organisms. In total, 32 exacerbations were studied. Following 14 days of intravenous antibiotics, all outcomes significantly improved independent of a pathogenic organism, except FEV1 and FVC. The most responsive markers were: 24-h sputum volume (reduced in all patients and 80% had ≥50% reduction); sputum bacterial clearance (78.1%); CRP (≥75% reduction in 62.5%) and SGRQ (≥4 unit improvement in 89.7%). CRP, 24-h sputum volume and SGRQ improved independent of microbial clearance. In the current study, 24-h sputum volume, microbial clearance, C-reactive protein and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire were the most useful parameters to assess response to treatment of exacerbations of bronchiectasis. Outcomes were similar independent of the pathogenic organism with the exception of forced expiratory volume in one second and forced vital capacity. Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 2009.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Murray, M. P., Turnbull, K., MacQuarrie, S., & Hill, A. T. (2009). Assessing response to treatment of exacerbations of bronchiectasis in adults. European Respiratory Journal, 33(2), 312–317. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00122508

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free