Chaotic mélange: neo-liberalism and neo-statism in the age of Sino-capitalism

1Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Following the central themes of this special forum, this article aims to move beyond binary debates on how China relates to the hitherto dominant US-led liberal order. The most debated outcomes–slipping into a Thucydides trap versus the resilience of the liberal international order–should be seen as two extreme cases that are unlikely to occur. Much more likely is a period with diminishing global leadership–a Kindleberger trap–and a metamorphosis of the liberal order as neo-liberal economics is increasingly infused with neo-statism. Analytically, I utilize a two-level analysis that traces historical processes at the level of the international political economy as well as the Chinese domestic level. China’s emergent form of capitalism, Sino-capitalism, is conceived of as a multifarious force, both neo-statist and neo-liberal. It combines top-down state-centric modes of governance with bottom-up networked modes of entrepreneurship. By using the internationalization of the Chinese Renminbi (RMB) as a case study, I illustrate the dynamics by which Sino-capitalism impinges on the International Monetary System. Sino-capitalism’s interactions with the liberal order are generating a mélange that joins neo-liberalism’s emphasis on private capital and unfettered market forces with a neo-statist reinsertion of government to manage economies. This mélange is likely to be chaotic as the United States becomes selectively isolationist, while China’s support of the existing order remains half-hearted. The developing chaotic mélange indicates that the global capitalist system could increasingly exhibit disorderly, dysfunctional and even dangerous trends.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McNally, C. A. (2020). Chaotic mélange: neo-liberalism and neo-statism in the age of Sino-capitalism. Review of International Political Economy, 27(2), 281–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2019.1683595

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free