Effect of recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor administration on the lymphocyte subsets of patients with refractory aplastic anemia

22Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Human recombinant granulocyte-macrophage colonystimulating factor (rhGM-CSF) was administered to 14 patients with refractory aplastic anemia (AA). The effect of rhGM-CSF therapy on the lymphocyte phenotype; on the proliferative responses to the mitogen phytohemagglutinin, Candida albicans, and tetanus toxoid antigens; and on the natural killer (NK) activity of the circulating lymphocytes was studied. Samples were collected before (baseline) and twice during the rhGM-CSF administration. The absolute number of circulating lymphocytes remained relatively constant during the first period, but experienced a significant increase (P < .001 ) during the second period. The increase was most prominent in the B cells (P < .001), but the T cells (P < .016) also increased. Detailed investigation of lymphocyte subsets showed an increase of the markers CD38 (Leu17), HLA-DR, and the transferrin receptor throughout the treatment course giving evidence of lymphoid cell activation. The NK cell activity was suppressed (P < .008) throughout the treatment. However, proliferative responses to phytohemagglutinin, Candida antigen, and tetanus toxoid were unaffected. Although the mechanism is not yet defined, GM-CSF does induce activation and increase in absolute lymphoid cell number, especially B cells, together with a decrease in NK cytotoxicity. The implication of these immune cell changes in relation to host resistance to microorganisms remains to be established. © 1990 by The American Society of Hematology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Faisal, M., Cumberland, W., Champlin, R., & Fahey, J. L. (1990). Effect of recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor administration on the lymphocyte subsets of patients with refractory aplastic anemia. Blood, 76(8), 1580–1585. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.v76.8.1580.bloodjournal7681580

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free