“Till we have faces”: Second-person relatedness as the object, end and crucial circumstance of perfect or “infused” virtues

1Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Does any child ever first acquire virtue in an Aristotelian manner? A subtle interpersonal play is the more typical locus of initial ethical formation. Moreover, many modern experiments, such as a picture of a pair of eyes being glued to an “honesty box” (Bateson et al. 2006), reveal how even a lifeless representation that evokes a sense of “second-person relatedness” (SPR) subtly encourages virtuous actions by adults. Classical virtue ethics does not easily accommodate these phenomena, but I have argued previously (Pinsent 2012) that the “infused” dispositions described by St Thomas Aquinas can be understood in terms of SPR. In this chapter, I propose that these insights, with some corroboration from contemporary social neuroscience, highlight the need for a “Copernican Revolution” of virtue ethics. I also review briefly some implications and propose ways in which the role of infused or second-person dispositions might be tested.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pinsent, A. (2016). “Till we have faces”: Second-person relatedness as the object, end and crucial circumstance of perfect or “infused” virtues. In Varieties of Virtue Ethics (pp. 267–279). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59177-7_16

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free