Paravertebral foramen screw fxation for posterior cervical spine fusion: Biomechanical study and description of a novel technique

12Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Fusion surgery with instrumentation is a widely accepted treatment for cervical spine pathologies. The authors propose a novel technique for subaxial cervical fusion surgery using paravertebral foramen screws (PVFS). The authors consider that PVFS have equal or greater biomechanical strength than lateral mass screws (LMS). The authors' goals of this study were to conduct a biomechanical study of PVFS, to investigate the suitability of PVFS as salvage fxation for failed LMS, and to describe this novel technique. METHODS The authors harvested 24 human cervical spine vertebrae (C3-6) from 6 fresh-frozen cadaver specimens from donors whose mean age was 84.3 ± 10.4 years at death. For each vertebra, one side was chosen randomly for PVFS and the other for LMS. For PVFS, a 3.2-mm drill with a stopper was advanced under lateral fluoroscopic imaging. The drill stopper was set to 12 mm, which was considered suffciently short not to breach the transverse foramen. The drill was directed from 20° to 25° medially so that the screw could purchase the relatively hard cancellous bone around the entry zone of the pedicle. The hole was tapped and a 4.5-mm-diameter × 12-mm screw was inserted. For LMS, 3.5-mm-diameter × 14-mm screws were inserted into the lateral mass of C3-6. The pullout strength of each screw was measured. After pullout testing of LMS, a drill was inserted into the screw hole and the superior cortex of the lateral mass was pried to cause a fracture through the screw hole, simulating intraoperative fracture of the lateral mass. After the procedure, PVFS for salvage (sPVFS) were inserted on the same side and pullout strength was measured. RESULTS The CT scans obtained after screw insertion revealed no sign of pedicle breaching, violation of the transverse foramen, or fracture of the lateral mass. A total of 69 screws were tested (23 PVFS, 23 LMS, and 23 sPVFS). One vertebra was not used because of a fracture that occurred while the specimen was prepared. The mean bone mineral density of the specimens was 0.29 ± 0.10 g/cm3. The mean pullout strength was 234 ± 114 N for PVFS, 158 ± 91 N for LMS, and 195 ± 125 N for sPVFS. The pullout strength for PVFS tended to be greater than that for LMS. However, the difference was not quite signifcant (p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS The authors introduce a novel fxation technique for the subaxial cervical spine. This study suggests that PVFS tend to provide stronger fxation than LMS for initial applications and fxation equal to LMS for salvage applications. If placement of LMS fails, PVFS can serve as a salvage fxation technique.

References Powered by Scopus

Complications associated with the technique of pedicle screw fixation: A selected survey of abs members

651Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Factors affecting the pullout strength of cancellous bone screws

448Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Radiological and anatomical evaluation of the atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation technique

444Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Effectiveness of short-segment fixation versus long-segment fixation for degenerative scoliosis with cobb angle 20°~40°: A retrospective observational study

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A new anatomical approach of cervical lateral mass for cervical pedicle screw and paravertebral foramen screw insertion

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Comparison of Morphometric Measurements of Traditional Posterior Cervical Screw and Paravertebral Foramen Screw in Chinese Population

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Maki, S., Aramomi, M., Matsuura, Y., Furuya, T., Ota, M., Iijima, Y., … Koda, M. (2017). Paravertebral foramen screw fxation for posterior cervical spine fusion: Biomechanical study and description of a novel technique. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 27(4), 415–420. https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.12.SPINE16803

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 14

52%

Researcher 7

26%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

19%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 22

79%

Nursing and Health Professions 3

11%

Neuroscience 3

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free