Comment on Seibert, M.K.; Rees, W.E. Through the Eye of a Needle: An Eco-Heterodox Perspective on the Renewable Energy Transition. Energies 2021, 14, 4508

4Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper exposes the many flaws in the article “Through the Eye of a Needle: An Eco-heterodox Perspective on the Renewable Energy Transition, authored by Siebert and Rees and recently published in Energies as a Review. Our intention in submitting this critique is to expose and rectify the original article’s non-scientific approach to the review process that includes selective (and hence biased) screening of the literature focusing on the challenges related to renewable energies, without discussing any of the well-documented solutions. In so doing, we also provide a rigorous refutation of several statements made by a Seibert–Rees paper, which often appear to be unsubstantiated personal opinions and not based on a balanced review of the available literature.

References Powered by Scopus

This article is free to access.

Get full text

This article is free to access.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fthenakis, V., Raugei, M., Breyer, C., Bhattacharya, S., Carbajales-Dale, M., Ginsberg, M., … Verlinden, P. (2022, February 1). Comment on Seibert, M.K.; Rees, W.E. Through the Eye of a Needle: An Eco-Heterodox Perspective on the Renewable Energy Transition. Energies 2021, 14, 4508. Energies. MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15030971

Readers over time

‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 9

56%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

44%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Energy 4

33%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

25%

Environmental Science 3

25%

Engineering 2

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0