Blackberry regrowth and persistence responses to defoliation in mixed rhizoma peanut-grass swards

0Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Sand blackberry (Rubus cuneifolius Pursh) is a troublesome perennial weed in Florida rhizoma peanut (Arachis glabrata Benth.)–grass pas­tures. The degree to which it can be controlled by defoliation is not well understood. In 2011 and 2012, blackberry regrowth and persistence responses were assessed by clipping every 35 d to three stubble heights (8, 16, and 24 cm), with or without simultaneous removal of all leaf from remaining stubble. Blackberry dry matter har­vested decreased linearly (12.8 to 8.5 g m-2) as clipping stubble height increased when remain­ing stubble leaf was removed, but there was a linear increase in blackberry harvested with increasing clipping stubble height (12.1 to 26.0 g m-2) if remaining stubble leaf was not removed. Across stubble heights, cumulative change in blackberry cover across the 2 yr was -15% units if stubble leaf was removed compared with +1% unit when leaf remained intact. As stubble height increased from 8 to 24 cm, blackberry cover increased linearly, both when stubble leaf was removed (-18 to 0% units, respectively) and when leaf remained intact (-12 to +17% units, respectively). In Year 1, blackberry stem density decreased 10 stems m-2 when stubble leaf was removed and 4 stems m-2 when leaf remained intact, but there was no effect of leaf removal in Year 2. Both clipping stubble height and removal of leaf mass affected blackberry regrowth and cover responses, suggesting that combining leaf removal by browsing animals with periodic close mowing will reduce black­berry cover, mass, and stem density.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Krueger, N. C., Sollenberger, L. E., Vendramini, J. M. B., Na, C., Mullenix, M. K., Aguiar, A. D., & Blount, A. R. (2016). Blackberry regrowth and persistence responses to defoliation in mixed rhizoma peanut-grass swards. Crop Science, 56(3), 1349–1355. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2015.09.0549

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free