Ticking-clock performance enhanced by nonclassical temporal correlations

9Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We investigate the role of nonclassical temporal correlations in enhancing the performance of ticking clocks in a discrete-time scenario. We show that the problem of optimal models for ticking clocks is related to the violation of Leggett-Garg-type temporal inequalities formulated in terms of, possibly invasive, sequential measurements, but on a system with a bounded memory capacity. Ticking clocks inspire the derivation of a family of temporal inequalities showing a gap between classical and quantum correlations, despite involving no input. We show that quantum ticking-clock models achieving accuracy beyond the classical bound are also those violating Leggett-Garg-type temporal inequalities for finite sequences and we investigate their continuous-time limit. Interestingly, we show that optimal classical clock models in the discrete-time scenario do not have a well-defined continuous-time limit, a feature that is absent in quantum models.

References Powered by Scopus

Completely positive dynamical semigroups of N-level systems

3055Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Quantum mechanics versus macroscopic realism: Is the flux there when nobody looks?

946Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Leggett-Garg inequalities

323Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Kochen-Specker contextuality

88Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Quantum Clocks are More Accurate Than Classical Ones

15Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Leggett-Garg macrorealism and temporal correlations

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Budroni, C., Vitagliano, G., & Woods, M. P. (2021). Ticking-clock performance enhanced by nonclassical temporal correlations. Physical Review Research, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.033051

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

50%

Researcher 2

50%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Physics and Astronomy 3

75%

Psychology 1

25%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free