Skip to main content
Journal ArticleOPEN ACCESS

A Theoretical Analysis of the Weak-beam Method of Electron Microscopy

Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung - Section A Journal of Physical Sciences (1972) 27(3) 452-460
DOI: 10.1515/zna-1972-0313
123Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The geometry of lattice defects can be studied in detail using the weak-beam method1 of high resolution electron microscopy. In this paper the theoretical basis of the method is discussed, and the experimental conditions which are necessary if particular methods of image interpretation are to be used are considered. © 1972, Walter de Gruyter. All rights reserved.

References Powered by Scopus

Investigations of dislocation strain fields using weak beams

Philosophical Magazine
550Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The measurement of stacking-fault energies of pure face-centred cubic metals

Philosophical Magazine
279Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Absorption parameters in electron diffraction theory

Philosophical Magazine
209Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text
View more at Scopus

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Transmission electron microscopy: A textbook for materials science

Transmission Electron Microscopy: A Textbook for Materials Science
2527Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Reasons for the superior mechanical properties of medium-entropy CrCoNi compared to high-entropy CrMnFeCoNi

Acta Materialia
1018Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The influence of manganese content on the stacking fault and austenite/ε-martensite interfacial energies in Fe-Mn-(Al-Si) steels investigated by experiment and theory

Acta Materialia
328Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text
View more at Scopus

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cockayne, D. J. H. (1972). A Theoretical Analysis of the Weak-beam Method of Electron Microscopy. Zeitschrift Fur Naturforschung - Section A Journal of Physical Sciences, 27(3), 452–460. https://doi.org/10.1515/zna-1972-0313

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

67%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

22%

Researcher 1

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Materials Science 7

70%

Physics and Astronomy 1

10%

Business, Management and Accounting 1

10%

Computer Science 1

10%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 2

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free