What are the functional consequences after TBI? The SHEFBIT cohort experience

0Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate functional outcome after TBI and identify variables that predict outcome in a multiordinal regression model. Background: The results of global outcome studies after Traumatic Brain Injury(TBI) differ widely due to differences in outcome measure, attrition to follow-up and selection bias. Outcome information would inform patients/families, guide service development and target high-risk individuals Subjects/Setting: prospective cohort of 1322 admissions with TBI, assessed by face to face interviews at 1 yr. Measures: Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE) by structured questionnaire. Results: At 1 year, outcome was determined in 1207(91.3%). Mean age was 46.9(SD17.3); Almost half(49.2%) had mild injury. At one year, 42.9% achieved Good Recovery but GOSE declined in 11.4% of the cohort compared to 10 weeks including 60(4.9%) deaths. In an ordinal logistic regression, increasing TBI severity, etiology (assault), more prominent CT abnormality, past psychiatric history and alcohol intoxication were independent predictors of worse GOSE. A pseudo-R2 of 0.38 suggested that many unmeasured factors also contribute to TBI outcome. Future work needs to identify other variables that may influence outcome. Conclusions: In a large TBI cohort, there is still considerable functional disability at 1 year. It may be possible to target high-risk groups for rehabilitation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Singh, R., Dawson, J., Mason, P. S., & Lecky, F. (2021). What are the functional consequences after TBI? The SHEFBIT cohort experience. Brain Injury, 35(12–13), 1630–1636. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2021.1978549

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free