Animating archaeology: Local theories and conceptually open-ended methodologies

177Citations
Citations of this article
158Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Animists' theories of matter must be given equivalence at the level of theory if we are to understand adequately the nature of ontological difference in the past. The current model is of a natural ontological continuum that connects all cultures, grounding our culturally relativist worldviews in a common world. Indigenous peoples' worlds are thought of as fascinating but ultimately mistaken ways of knowing the world. We demonstrate how ontologically oriented theorists Eduardo Viveiros de Castro, Karen Barad and Tim Ingold in conjuncture with an anti-representationalist methodology can provide the necessary conditions for alternative ontologies to emerge in archaeology. Anthropo-zoomorphic 'body-pots' from first-millennium ad northwest Argentina anticipate the possibility that matter was conceptualized as chronically unstable, inherently undifferentiated, and ultimately practice-dependent. Copyright © The McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research 2009.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alberti, B., & Marshall, Y. (2009, October). Animating archaeology: Local theories and conceptually open-ended methodologies. Cambridge Archaeological Journal. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774309000535

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free