Philosophical discussion of theistic arguments mainly focus on their first (existence) stage, which argues for the existence of something having some very general, if suggestive, feature. I shall instead consider only the second (identification) stage of one such argument, the cosmological argument from contingency. Taking for granted the existence of an absolutely necessary being, I develop an extended line of argument that supports the more nearly theistic claim that such a being is a transcendent, personal cause of our contingent universe.
CITATION STYLE
O’Connor, T. (2004). And this all men call god. Faith and Philosophy, 21(4), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.5840/faithphil200421436
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.