Noise properties of gravitational lens mass reconstruction

105Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Gravitational lensing is potentially able to observe mass-selected haloes, and to measure the projected cluster mass function. An optimal mass selection requires a quantitative understanding of the noise behaviour in mass maps. This paper is an analysis of the noise properties in mass maps reconstructed from a maximum-likelihood method. The first part of this work is the derivation of the noise power spectrum and the mass error bars as a straightforward extension of the Kaiser & Squires algorithm for the case of a correlated noise. Very good agreement is found between these calculations and the noise properties measured in the mass reconstructions limited to non-critical clusters of galaxies. It demonstrates that Kaiser & Squires and maximum-likelihood methods have similar noise properties and that the weak lensing approximation is valid for describing these properties. In a second stage I show that the statistics of peaks in the noise follows accurately the peak statistics of a two-dimensional Gaussian random field (using the BBKS techniques) if the smoothing aperture contains enough galaxies. This analysis provides a full procedure for deriving the significance of any convergence peak as a function of its amplitude and profile. I demonstrate that a detailed quantitative analysis of the structures in mass maps can be carried out, and that, to a very good approximation, a mass map is the sum of the lensing signal and known two-dimensional Gaussian random noise. A straightforward application is the measurement of the projected mass function in wide-field lensing surveys, down to small mass overdensities that are individually undetectable.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Van Waerbeke, L. (2000). Noise properties of gravitational lens mass reconstruction. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 313(3), 524–532. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03259.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free