Numerical Investigation of Slurry Pressure Drop at Different Pipe Roughness in a Straight Pipe Using CFD

26Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Slurry flow (water–glass beads) through a horizontal pipe of diameter, 0.0549 m and length, 3.8 m with two particle sizes, i.e., 125- and 440-micron, has been numerically modeled and investigated based on the kinetic theory of slurry transportation. The effect of particles interaction on the pipe flow characteristics such as velocity profile, wall shear stress, vector regime, granular pressure and temperature has been evaluated at different solid concentration and flow velocity range. It is well established that the pressure drop is the key parameter for the design of efficient slurry pipeline system, which is influenced by factors such as flow velocity, slurry viscosity, solid concentration, pipe material and pipe geometry. However, to best of our knowledge, the estimation of pressure drop at different pipe roughness height and a concentration range of 40–60% is not yet established. Therefore, in the present work, the numerical simulation is carried out for slurry flow through a horizontal pipeline at different roughness heights (Rh = 10–50 micron) and Prandtl numbers, i.e., 1.34, 2.14, 3.42 and 5.83. The kinetic parameters are calculated at a flow velocity (Vm) of 1–5 ms−1 and solid concentration (Cw) range of 40–60%. The results and procedure of the current simulation are validated against the available experimental results in the literature. The outcomes of the present work reveals that pressure drop increases with increase in pipe roughness height for the chosen velocity and solid concentration range. In addition, the larger particle is found to have more influence on the pressure, velocity, temperature distribution for the entire range of flow velocity and solid concentration. Furthermore, settling velocity and specific energy consumption are also predicted and discussed through the slurry pipeline. The findings show that the settling velocity of particle increases with increase in particle size at different Prandtl number. The energy efficiency for solid transportation through pipeline at different Prandtl numbers and particle size are also evaluated. Based on the results, it is concluded that specific energy efficiency varies with solid concentration and particle size, i.e., higher concentration and larger particle size demonstrates higher energy consumption. Furthermore, fluid at low Prandtl number exhibits higher energy consumptions. In order to design the efficient slurry pipeline system, it is recommended that the slurry must be transported at low velocity and high Prandtl number.

References Powered by Scopus

Equation of state for nonattracting rigid spheres

4959Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Friction Factors for Pipe Flow

1751Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The effects of an impact velocity dependent coefficient of restitution on stresses developed by sheared granular materials

218Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

CFD modeling for slurry flow through a horizontal pipe bend at different Prandtl number

26Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Slurry flow characteristics through a horizontal pipeline at different Prandtl number

25Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Estimation of energy consumption and transportation characteristics for slurry flow through a horizontal straight pipe using computational fluid dynamics

17Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Joshi, T., Parkash, O., & Krishan, G. (2022). Numerical Investigation of Slurry Pressure Drop at Different Pipe Roughness in a Straight Pipe Using CFD. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 47(12), 15391–15414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-022-06583-1

Readers over time

‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

60%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

20%

Researcher 1

20%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 8

100%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0