Quality at general practice consultations: Cross sectional survey

305Citations
Citations of this article
128Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives. To measure quality of care at general practice consultations in diverse geographical areas, and to determine the principal correlates associated with enablement as an outcome measure. Design. Cross sectional multipractice questionnaire based study. Setting. Random sample of practices in four participating regions: Lothian, Coventry, Oxfordshire, and west London. Participants. 25,994 adults attending 53 practices over two weeks in March and April 1998. Main outcome measures. Patient enablement duration of consultation, how well patients know their doctor, and the size of the practice list. Results. A hierarchy of needs or reasons for consultation was created. Similar overall enablement scores were achieved for most casemix presentations (mean 3.1, 95% confidence interval 3.1 to 3.1). Mean duration of consultation for all patients was 8.0 minutes (8.0 to 8.1); however, duration of consultation increased for patients with psychological problems or where psychological and social problems coexisted (mean 9.1, 9.0 to 9.2). The 2195 patients who spoke languages other than English at home were analysed separately as they had generally higher enablement scores (mean 4.5, 4.3 to 4.7) than those patients who spoke English only despite having shorter consultations (mean 7.1 (6.9 to 7.3) minutes. At individual consultations, enablement score was most closely correlated with duration of consultation and knowing the doctor well. Individual doctors had a wide range of mean enablement scores (1.1-5.3) and mean durations of consultation (3.8-14.4 minutes). Doctors' ability to enable was linked to the duration of their consultation and the percentage of their patients who knew them well and was inversely related to the size of their practice. At practice level, mean enablement scores ranged from 2.3 to 4.4, and duration of consultation ranged from 4.9 to 12.2 minutes. Correlations between ranks at practice level were not significant. Conclusions. It may be time to reward doctors who have longer consultations, provide greater continuity of care, and both enable more patients and enable patients more.

References Powered by Scopus

A comparison of a Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) against two established satisfaction scales as an outcome measure of primary care consultations

383Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Do clinical guidelines introduced with practice based education improve care of asthmatic and diabetic patients? A randomised controlled trial in general practices in east London

205Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

What future for continuity of care in general practice?

141Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Empathy decline and its reasons: A systematic review of studies with medical students and residents

1018Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Observational study of effect of patient centredness and positive approach on outcomes of general practice consultations

672Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Interpersonal continuity of care and care outcomes: A critical review

479Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Howie, J. G. R., Heaney, D. J., Maxwell, M., Walker, J. J., Freeman, G. K., & Rai, H. (1999). Quality at general practice consultations: Cross sectional survey. British Medical Journal, 319(7212), 738–743. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.319.7212.738

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 52

65%

Researcher 17

21%

Professor / Associate Prof. 10

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

1%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 58

73%

Social Sciences 10

13%

Psychology 8

10%

Nursing and Health Professions 4

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free