Comparative evaluation of U.S. brand and generic intravenous sodium ferric gluconate complex in sucrose injection: In vitro cellular uptake

6Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Iron deficiency anemia is a common clinical consequence for people who suffer from chronic kidney disease, especially those requiring dialysis. Intravenous (IV) iron therapy is a widely accepted safe and efficacious treatment for iron deficiency anemia. Numerous IV iron drugs have been approved by U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), including a single generic product, sodium ferric gluconate complex in sucrose. In this study, we compared the cellular iron uptake profiles of the brand (Ferrlecit®) and generic sodium ferric gluconate (SFG) products. We used a colorimetric assay to examine the amount of iron uptake by three human macrophage cell lines. This is the first published study to provide a parallel evaluation of the cellular uptake of a brand and a generic IV iron drug in a mononuclear phagocyte system. The results showed no difference in iron uptake across all cell lines, tested doses, and time points. The matching iron uptake profiles of Ferrlecit® and its generic product support the FDA’s present position detailed in the draft guidance on development of SFG complex products that bioequivalence can be based on qualitative (Q1) and quantitative (Q2) formulation sameness, similar physiochemical characterization, and pharmacokinetic bioequivalence studies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wu, M., Sun, D., Tyner, K., Jiang, W., & Rouse, R. (2017). Comparative evaluation of U.S. brand and generic intravenous sodium ferric gluconate complex in sucrose injection: In vitro cellular uptake. Nanomaterials, 7(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/nano7120451

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free