Histologic retrieval rate of a newly designed side-bevelled 20G needle for EUS-guided tissue acquisition of solid pancreatic lesions

36Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Innovative approaches to improve diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) have focused on needle design with development of fine-needle biopsy (FNB) needles with microcore-acquisition technology. Recently, a 20-gauge (20G) antegrade-cutting-side-bevelled biopsy needle (ProCore®) was developed for EUS-TA, but data about its diagnostic performance and histological capability are scant. Objectives: We assessed the diagnostic performance and histologic retrieval rate of a new 20G antegrade-cutting-side-bevelled biopsy needle compared with a 22G reverse-side-bevelled needle for EUS sampling of solid pancreatic lesions. Patients and methods: A retrospective analysis of 238 consecutively collected patients who underwent EUS-TA using a 20G or a 22G ProCore® needle, without rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE), was conducted at two centres. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were calculated. Histologic tissue retrieval was evaluated applying a scoring system for each case. Results: Sensitivity and specificity were estimated as 98.4–100% in the 20G-, and 94.9–100% in the 22G-needle groups, respectively (p > 0.99). The 20G procured more histologic-grade tissues (92.6% vs 49.5%, p < 0.0001) achieved by a lower number of passes (2.64 vs 3.44, p < 0.0001) compared to the 22G. Conclusions: Both side-bevelled FNB needles achieved a high diagnostic sensitivity. The 20G-side-bevelled needle obtained a significantly higher microcore retrieval rate.

References Powered by Scopus

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma, version 2.2017: Clinical practice guidelines in Oncology

795Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Endoscopic ultrasonography with guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in pancreatic disease

571Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Influence of on-site cytopathology evaluation on the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of solid pancreatic masses

301Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Comparison of fine-needle aspiration and fine-needle biopsy devices for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid lesions: a systemic review and meta-analysis

89Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Comparison between EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology and EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy histology for the evaluation of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

80Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Comparison of a 22-gauge Franseen-tip needle with a 20-gauge forward-bevel needle for the diagnosis of type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study (COMPAS study)

74Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Armellini, E., Manfrin, E., Trisolini, E., Andorno, S., Ballarè, M., Bernardoni, L., … Crinò, S. F. (2019). Histologic retrieval rate of a newly designed side-bevelled 20G needle for EUS-guided tissue acquisition of solid pancreatic lesions. United European Gastroenterology Journal, 7(1), 96–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050640618804443

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

44%

Researcher 3

33%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 10

77%

Social Sciences 1

8%

Physics and Astronomy 1

8%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free