Guidelines for identifying homologous recombination events in influenza A virus

69Citations
Citations of this article
93Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The rapid evolution of influenza viruses occurs both clonally and non-clonally through a variety of genetic mechanisms and selection pressures. The non-clonal evolution of influenza viruses comprises relatively frequent reassortment among gene segments and a more rarely reported process of non-homologous RNA recombination. Homologous RNA recombination within segments has been proposed as a third such mechanism, but to date the evidence for the existence of this process among influenza viruses has been both weak and controversial. As homologous recombination has not yet been demonstrated in the laboratory, supporting evidence, if it exists, may come primarily from patterns of phylogenetic incongruence observed in gene sequence data. Here, we review the necessary criteria related to laboratory procedures and sample handling, bioinformatic analysis, and the known ecology and evolution of influenza viruses that need to be met in order to confirm that a homologous recombination event occurred in the history of a set of sequences. To determine if these criteria have an effect on recombination analysis, we gathered 8307 publicly available full-length sequences of influenza A segments and divided them into those that were sequenced via the National Institutes of Health Influenza Genome Sequencing Project (IGSP) and those that were not. As sample handling and sequencing are executed to a very high standard in the IGSP, these sequences should be less likely to be exposed to contamination by other samples or by laboratory strains, and thus should not exhibit laboratory-generated signals of homologous recombination. Our analysis shows that the IGSP data set contains only two phylogenetically-supported single recombinant sequences and no recombinant clades. In marked contrast, the non-IGSP data show a very large amount of potential recombination. We conclude that the presence of false positive signals in the non-IGSP data is more likely than false negatives in the IGSP data, and that given the evidence to date, homologous recombination seems to play little or no role in the evolution of influenza A viruses. © 2010 Boni et al.

References Powered by Scopus

MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput

35733Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

MODELTEST: Testing the model of DNA substitution

18534Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

RAxML-VI-HPC: Maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models

14161Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Evolutionary origins of the SARS-CoV-2 sarbecovirus lineage responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic

658Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Why do RNA viruses recombine?

529Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Recombination in viruses: Mechanisms, methods of study, and evolutionary consequences

286Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Boni, M. F., de Jong, M. D., van Doorn, H. R., & Holmes, E. C. (2010). Guidelines for identifying homologous recombination events in influenza A virus. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010434

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 37

48%

Researcher 27

35%

Professor / Associate Prof. 11

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35

54%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 13

20%

Medicine and Dentistry 12

18%

Immunology and Microbiology 5

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free