Thermal disequilibration of ions and electrons by collisionless plasma turbulence

97Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Does overall thermal equilibrium exist between ions and electrons in a weakly collisional, magnetized, turbulent plasma? And, if not, how is thermal energy partitioned between ions and electrons? This is a fundamental question in plasma physics, the answer to which is also crucial for predicting the properties of far-distant astronomical objects such as accretion disks around black holes. In the context of disks, this question was posed nearly two decades ago and has since generated a size-able literature. Here we provide the answer for the case in which energy is injected into the plasma via Alfvénic turbulence: Collisionless turbulent heating typically acts to disequilibrate the ion and electron temperatures. Numerical simulations using a hybrid fluid-gyrokinetic model indicate that the ion–electron heating-rate ratio is an increasing function of the thermal-to-magnetic energy ratio, β i : It ranges from ∼0.05 at β i = 0.1 to at least 30 for β i & 10. This energy partition is approximately insensitive to the ion-to-electron temperature ratio T i /Te. Thus, in the absence of other equilibrating mechanisms, a collisionless plasma system heated via Alfvénic turbulence will tend toward a nonequilib-rium state in which one of the species is significantly hotter than the other, i.e., hotter ions at high β i and hotter electrons at low β i . Spectra of electromagnetic fields and the ion distribution function in 5D phase space exhibit an interesting new magnetically dominated regime at high β i and a tendency for the ion heating to be mediated by nonlinear phase mixing (“entropy cascade”) when β i . 1 and by linear phase mixing (Landau damping) when β i 1.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kawazura, Y., Barnes, M., & Schekochihin, A. A. (2019). Thermal disequilibration of ions and electrons by collisionless plasma turbulence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(3), 771–776. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1812491116

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free