Response of Alfalfa under Salt Stress to the Application of Potassium Sulfate Nanoparticles

  • El-Sharkawy M
  • El-Beshsbeshy T
  • Mahmoud E
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A greenhouse study was conducted to explore the effect of various rates of potassium sulfate (K 2 SO 4) nanoparticles on alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) growth and physiological response under salt stress. One salt-tolerant genotype (Me-sa-Sirsa) and one salt-sensitive genotype (Bulldog 505) were selected based on germination under salt and were planted in pots containing 2 kg of sand. The two genotypes were subjected to 0 and 6 dS • m −1 salt levels using CaCl 2 • 2H 2 O: NaCl (2:1) mixed with Hoagland solution. Three K 2 SO 4 nanoparticle treat-ments consisting of, 1/4, 1/8, and 1/10 of the potassium (K) level in full strength Hoagland solution (235 mg • L −1) were applied. Adding K 2 SO 4 nano-particles at the 1/8 level resulted in the highest shoot dry weight, relative yield, root length and root dry weight in both genotypes. The different rates of K 2 SO 4 nanoparticles affected significantly Na/K ratio and the concentrations of Calcium (Ca), Phosphorus (P), Copper (Cu), Manganese (Mn), and Zinc (Zn) in plant tissue. The application of K 2 SO 4 nanoparticles at the 1/8 rate enhanced the plant's physiological response to salt stress by reducing electro-lyte leakage, increasing catalase and proline content, and increasing antioxi-dant enzymes, activity. These results suggest that the application of K nano-particles may have better efficiency than conventional K fertilizers in provid-ing adequate plant nutrition and overcoming the negative effects of salt stress in alfalfa.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

El-Sharkawy, M. S., El-Beshsbeshy, T. R., Mahmoud, E. K., Abdelkader, N. I., Al-Shal, R. M., & Missaoui, A. M. (2017). Response of Alfalfa under Salt Stress to the Application of Potassium Sulfate Nanoparticles. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 08(08), 1751–1773. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2017.88120

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free