Quantitative Comparison of Conventional and t-SNE-guided Gating Analyses

41Citations
Citations of this article
104Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Dimensionality reduction using the t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE) algorithm has emerged as a popular tool for visualizing high-parameter single-cell data. While this approach has obvious potential for data visualization it remains unclear how t-SNE analysis compares to conventional manual hand-gating in stratifying and quantitating the frequency of diverse immune cell populations. We applied a comprehensive 38-parameter mass cytometry panel to human blood and compared the frequencies of 28 immune cell subsets using both conventional bivariate and t-SNE-guided manual gating. t-SNE analysis was capable of stratifying every general cellular lineage and most sub-lineages with high correlation between conventional and t-SNE-guided cell frequency calculations. However, specific immune cell subsets delineated by the manual gating of continuous variables were not fully separated in t-SNE space thus causing discrepancies in subset identification and quantification between these analytical approaches. Overall, these studies highlight the consistency between t-SNE and conventional hand-gating in stratifying general immune cell lineages while demonstrating that particular cell subsets defined by conventional manual gating may be intermingled in t-SNE space.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Eshghi, S. T., Au-Yeung, A., Takahashi, C., Bolen, C. R., Nyachienga, M. N., Lear, S. P., … O’Gorman, W. E. (2019). Quantitative Comparison of Conventional and t-SNE-guided Gating Analyses. Frontiers in Immunology, 10(JUN). https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.01194

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free