Comparison of the effect of weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing positions on knee position sense in patients with chronic stroke

13Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to investigate the knee joint proprioception in weight-bearing (WB) and non-weight-bearing (NWB) positions and to study the difference between the methods in chronic stroke patients. [Subjects and Methods] The subjects were 15 stroke patients who were randomly scheduled to perform both positions by a physical therapist not involved in the study. The subjects performed the positions (WB and NWB) based on a randomized controlled cross-sectional design. WB subjects were positioned in one-leg standing to assess the knee joint position sense. NWB subjects were instructed to sit comfortably in a chair and maintain the knees at 90° of flexion with the leg out of the plinth. [Results] The results revealed that the WB position showed a significant difference in knee position sense. The proprioception sense in the WB position was a higher than that in the NWB position. [Conclusion] The knee proprioception of chronic stroke patients differs between the weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing positions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bang, D. H., Shin, W. S., Choi, S. J., & Choi, H. S. (2015). Comparison of the effect of weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing positions on knee position sense in patients with chronic stroke. Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 27(4), 1203–1206. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.1203

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free