The cost of a QALY

32Citations
Citations of this article
92Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Current regulation of drug approvals has caused considerable controversy as entrusted to the National Institute of Clinical Excellence, and has led to a lack of availability of modern medicines on the basis of calculations made of 'value'. Aim: We have examined the assessment tool used by National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) to establish the cost of drugs in order to assess whether it is a reasonable and objective evaluation methodology. Design: A review of the methods of analysis. Methods: An objective assessment of the value of the Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY). Results: We conclude that current methods used by NICE to assess drug costs are arbitrary, subjective and fail to reflect the true costs for patients, which are grossly overestimated. Conclusion: NICE needs to look again at the evaluation methods for calculating drug costs, and change their methodology from a subjective to an objective measure of true cost. © The Author 2010. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Physicians. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kirkdale, R., Krell, J., O’Hanlon Brown, C., Tuthill, M., & Waxman, J. (2010). The cost of a QALY. QJM: An International Journal of Medicine, 103(9), 715–720. https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcq081

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free