Characteristics of hip fracture patients with and without muscle atrophy/weakness: Predictors of negative economic outcomes

7Citations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: Hip fractures have negative humanistic and economic consequences. Predictors and sub-groups of negative post-fracture outcomes (high costs and extensive healthcare utilization) were identified in patients with and without muscle atrophy/weakness (MAW). Methods: Truven Health MarketScan data identified patients ≥50 years old with inpatient hospitalizations for hip fracture. Patients had ≥12 months of continuous healthcare insurance prior to and following index hospitalization and no hip fracture diagnoses between 7 days and 1 year prior to admission. Predictors and sub-groups of negative outcomes were identified via multiple logistic regression analyses and classification and regression tree (CART) analyses, respectively. Results: Post-fracture 1-year all-cause healthcare costs (USD31,430) were higher than costs for the prior year (18,091; p < 0.0001). Patients with MAW had greater post-fracture healthcare utilization and costs than those without MAW (p < 0.05). Greater post-fracture costs were associated with a higher number of prior hospitalizations and emergency room visits, length of index hospitalization, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and discharge status; diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, or osteoporosis; and prior use of antidepressants, anticonvulsants, muscle relaxants, benzodiazepines, opioids, and oral corticosteroids (all p < 0.009). High-cost patient sub-groups included those with MAW and high CCI scores. Conclusions: Negative post-fracture outcomes were associated with MAW vs no MAW, prior hospitalizations, comorbidities, and medications.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cui, Z., Schoenfeld, M. J., Bush, E. N., Chen, Y., & Burge, R. (2015). Characteristics of hip fracture patients with and without muscle atrophy/weakness: Predictors of negative economic outcomes. Journal of Medical Economics, 18(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3111/13696998.2014.969433

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free