A novel patient-centered “intention-to-treat” metric of U.S. lung transplant center performance

11Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Despite the importance of pretransplantation outcomes, 1-year posttransplantation survival is typically considered the primary metric of lung transplant center performance in the United States. We designed a novel lung transplant center performance metric that incorporates both pre- and posttransplantation survival time. We performed an ecologic study of 12 187 lung transplant candidates listed at 56 U.S. lung transplant centers between 2006 and 2012. We calculated an “intention-to-treat” survival (ITTS) metric as the percentage of waiting list candidates surviving at least 1 year after transplantation. The median center-level 1-year posttransplantation survival rate was 84.1%, and the median center-level ITTS was 66.9% (mean absolute difference 19.6%, 95% limits of agreement 4.3 to 35.1%). All but 10 centers had ITTS values that were significantly lower than 1-year posttransplantation survival rates. Observed ITTS was significantly lower than expected ITTS for 7 centers. These data show that one third of lung transplant candidates do not survive 1 year after transplantation, and that 12% of centers have lower than expected ITTS. An “intention-to-treat” survival metric may provide a more realistic expectation of patient outcomes at transplant centers and may be of value to transplant centers and policymakers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Maldonado, D. A., RoyChoudhury, A., & Lederer, D. J. (2018). A novel patient-centered “intention-to-treat” metric of U.S. lung transplant center performance. American Journal of Transplantation, 18(1), 226–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.14486

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free