Performance and clinical role of endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration for diagnosing gastrointestinal intramural lesions

3Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background/Aims: We evaluated the performance, clinical role, and diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in gastrointestinal intramural lesions. Methods: Procedural and pathologic data were reviewed from consecutive patients undergoing EUS-FNA for intramural lesions. Final diagnoses were determined by surgical histopathologic conformation and the diagnosis of malignancy, including clinical follow-up with repeat imaging. Results: Forty-six patients (mean age, 47 years; 24 males) underwent EUS-FNA. Lesions were located in the stomach (n=31), esophagus (n=5), and duodenum (n=10). The median lesion size was 2 cm (range, 1 to 20.6). Final diagnoses were obtained in 22 patients (48%). EUSFNA was diagnostic in 40 patients (87%). The diagnostic accuracy of cytology for differentiating between benign and malignant lesions was 82%; diagnostic error occurred in three patients (6%). The cytologic results influenced clinical judgment in 78% cases. The primary reasons for negative or no clinical impact were false-negative results, misdirected patient management, and inconclusive cytology. Conclusions: EUS-FNA exhibited an 87% diagnostic yield for gastrointestinal intramural lesions; the accuracy of cytology for differentiating malignancy was 82%. The limitations of EUS-FNA were primarily because of nondiagnostic sampling (9%) and probable diagnostic error (6%); these factors may influence the clinical role of EUS-FNA. © 2013 Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sung, H. J., Cho, Y. K., Park, E. Y., Moon, S. J., Lim, C. H., Kim, J. S., … Choi, K. Y. (2013). Performance and clinical role of endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration for diagnosing gastrointestinal intramural lesions. Clinical Endoscopy, 46(6), 627–632. https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2013.46.6.627

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free