Forming perceptions and the limits to public participation on ocean commons: Evidence from a citizens jury workshop

2Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article presents data from a citizens jury-inspired deliberative workshop held to tease out stakeholder views of management priorities for a section of the North Sea: the Dogger Bank. As this article reveals, the lessons learned from the Dogger Bank workshop advocate not simply what is required for managing one particular ocean commons, but also highlight some of the public participation research design failings, taking public participation in resource management further by adding to the literature and theoretical discussions on the public sphere. Analysis of the citizens jury-inspired deliberative workshop also highlights the critical issue of power inherent, yet often unacknowledged, in public participation in environmental management. Stakeholder opinions uncovered through workshop discussions also show how commons are viewed today – as an economic resource – highlighting the trend of the mainstreaming of the commodification of the commons.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hadjimichael, M., & Delaney, A. E. (2017). Forming perceptions and the limits to public participation on ocean commons: Evidence from a citizens jury workshop. International Journal of the Commons, 11(1), 200–219. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.693

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free