An extensive unified thermo-electric module characterization method

25Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Thermo-Electric Modules (TEMs) are being increasingly used in power generation as a valid alternative to batteries, providing autonomy to sensor nodes or entire Wireless Sensor Networks, especially for energy harvesting applications. Often, manufacturers provide some essential parameters under determined conditions, like for example, maximum temperature difference between the surfaces of the TEM or for maximum heat absorption, but in many cases, a TEM-based system is operated under the best conditions only for a fraction of the time, thus, when dynamic working conditions occur, the performance estimation of TEMs is crucial to determine their actual efficiency. The focus of this work is on using a novel procedure to estimate the parameters of both the electrical and thermal equivalent model and investigate their relationship with the operating temperature and the temperature gradient. The novelty of the method consists in the use of a simple test configuration to stimulate the modules and simultaneously acquire electrical and thermal data to obtain all parameters in a single test. Two different current profiles are proposed as possible stimuli, which use depends on the available test instrumentation, and relative performance are compared both quantitatively and qualitatively, in terms of standard deviation and estimation uncertainty. Obtained results, besides agreeing with both technical literature and a further estimation method based on module specifications, also provides the designer a detailed description of the module behavior, useful to simulate its performance in different scenarios.

Figures

  • Figure 1. Typical TEM voltage profile using transient method: applied current I (Bottom) and resulting voltage V (Top) vs. time.
  • Figure 2. I V plot for three different bias point of the CS (solid) vs. SS one (bold).
  • Figure 3. Automatic measurement setup.
  • Figure 4. TEM control loop.
  • Figure 7. Measured step response ∆T32 (black) vs. simulated (red) of the identified model H32.
  • Table 1. Identification Results.
  • Figure 12. (a) standard deviation in all working conditions for CS method; (b) standard deviation in all working conditions for the CS method.
  • Figure 13. Standard deviation of thermal resistance Θ .

References Powered by Scopus

Modeling and analysis of thermoelectric modules

349Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Measurement of thermal conductivity by utilization of the peltier effect

165Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Characterization of thermoelectric modules for powering autonomous sensors

139Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Multi-criteria decision-making in the location selection for a solar PV power plant using AHP

131Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Fast detection of olive trees affected by xylella fastidiosa from uavs using multispectral imaging

59Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Thermal energy harvesting on the bodily surfaces of arms and legs through a wearable thermo-electric generator

51Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Attivissimo, F., Carducci, C. G. C., Lanzolla, A. M. L., & Spadavecchia, M. (2016). An extensive unified thermo-electric module characterization method. Sensors (Switzerland), 16(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/s16122114

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘22‘23‘24‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

47%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

33%

Researcher 2

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 11

73%

Physics and Astronomy 2

13%

Energy 1

7%

Business, Management and Accounting 1

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0