Accuracy of the Axillary Temperature Screening Compared to Core Rectal Temperature in Infants

4Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose. To compare the sensitivity of axillary and rectal temperature in infants who presents to the emergency department with a recent history of fever. Methods. A single-center cross-sectional comparative study of 201 patients who presents with a recent history of fever. Infants Up to 12 months of age were included. Demographic characteristics such as age and gender, weight, mean axillary and rectal temperatures were documented. Fever is defined as rectal temperature >38°C as opposed to >37.4 in the axillary method. Results. The mean age was 6.1 ± 3.5 months. The mean (SD) rectal-axillary temperature difference was 0.8°C ± 0.7°C which was statistically significant (P 37.4 were 79.34% (95% CI [73-84.9]), 14.3% (95% CI [0.36-57.9]), 96.2% (95% CI [95-97.2]), and 2.4% (95% CI [0.4-13.5]), respectively. Conclusion. The rectal method remains highly important for accurate and prompt diagnosis in infants.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alayed, Y., Kilani, M. A., Hommadi, A., Alkhalifah, M., Alhaffar, D., & Bashir, M. (2022). Accuracy of the Axillary Temperature Screening Compared to Core Rectal Temperature in Infants. Global Pediatric Health, 9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333794X221107481

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free