Publisher Correction: Nuclear pores as versatile reference standards for quantitative superresolution microscopy (Nature Methods, (2019), 16, 10, (1045-1053), 10.1038/s41592-019-0574-9)

1Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In the version of this Article originally published, at the end of the caption for Fig. 3f, the text ‘measured in GLOX/MEA’ was missing; this has now been corrected. Additionally, Supplementary Tables 3 and 4 were missing from the Supplementary Information, and their citations were missing from the main text. The Supplementary Information file has now been updated; and citations have been added in the main text to the sentence beginning “We thus extended our counting references...”, for Supplementary Table 3; and in the sentences beginning “Example images for all labels...” and “Typical acquisition parameters can be found...” for Supplementary Table 4.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Thevathasan, J. V., Kahnwald, M., Cieśliński, K., Hoess, P., Peneti, S. K., Reitberger, M., … Ries, J. (2019, December 1). Publisher Correction: Nuclear pores as versatile reference standards for quantitative superresolution microscopy (Nature Methods, (2019), 16, 10, (1045-1053), 10.1038/s41592-019-0574-9). Nature Methods. Nature Research. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0659-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free