The Iron Law of Unintended Effects, Again? Outcome Measures and Blame-Avoidance

  • Garlatti A
  • Fedele P
  • Ianniello M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The shift from output to outcome measures is a recurrent doctrine in public administration studies and practice. However, as with many popular doctrines before, more empirical analysis is still needed. This chapter focuses on the unintended effects of outcome-based performance management and explores how the use of outcome measures influences blame-avoidance strategies by officials and service providers. In looking for answers and using the concept of social mechanism as the analytical lens, this contribution explores a pilot case in the Italian public sector, where a performance ranking composed of outcome measures was introduced as the pivotal performance management tool. Results allow to conceptualize a link between the type of blame-avoidance response and the features of the potential blamers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Garlatti, A., Fedele, P., & Ianniello, M. (2018). The Iron Law of Unintended Effects, Again? Outcome Measures and Blame-Avoidance (pp. 45–62). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57018-1_3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free