Association of hba1c values with mortality and cardiovascular events in diabetic dialysis patients. the invor study and review of the literature

21Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Improved glycemic control reduces complications in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). However, it is discussed controversially whether patients with diabetes mellitus and end-stage renal disease benefit from strict glycemic control. Methods: We followed 78 patients with DM initiating dialysis treatment of the region of Vorarlberg in a prospective cohort study applying a time-dependent Cox regression analysis using all measured laboratory values for up to more than seven years. This resulted in 880 HbA1c measurements (with one measurement every 3.16 patient months on average) during the entire observation period. Non-linear P-splines were used to allow flexible modeling of the association with mortality and cardiovascular disease (CVD) events. Results: We observed a decreased mortality risk with increasing HbA1c values (HR = 0.72 per 1% increase, p = 0.024). Adjustment for age and sex and additional adjustment for other CVD risk factors only slightly attenuated the association (HR = 0.71, p = 0.044). A non-linear P-spline showed that the association did not follow a fully linear pattern with a highly significant non-linear component (p = 0.001) with an increased risk of all-cause mortality for HbA1c values up to 6-7%. Causes of death were associated with HbA1c values. The risk for CVD events, however, increased with increasing HbA1c values (HR = 1.24 per 1% increase, p = 0.048) but vanished after extended adjustments. Conclusions: This study considered the entire information collected on HbA1c over a period of more than seven years. Besides the methodological advantages our data indicate a significant inverse association between HbA1c levels and all-cause mortality. However, for CVD events no significant association could be found. © 2011 Sturm et al.

Figures

  • Table 1. Clinical characteristics of patients at baseline and during follow-up stratified by survival and by CVD events.
  • Figure 1. Distribution of all 880 measured HbA1c values during follow-up stratified for survivors and non-survivors.
  • Table 2. Causes of death stratified by HbA1c ,7% vs. $7% at baseline.
  • Table 3. Results from a linear mixed effects model of HbA1c ,7% on parameters of malnutrition and inflammation.
  • Table 4. The association of time-dependent HbA1c with all-cause mortality, CVD events and the combination of CVD and PAD events using multiple Cox-proportional hazards models.
  • Figure 2. Cox regression results: P-splines to explore the functional form of the effect of HbA1c values on the log hazard ratio for the risk of a) all-cause mortality and of b) cardiovascular disease events, adjusted for age, sex, time-dependent systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, albumin, CRP, hemoglobin and previous CVD. Dashed lines are the pointwise 95% CI. The rugplot at the bottom of the figures displays the number of measurements. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020093.g002
  • Table 5. Studies in dialysis patients with diabetes mellitus which found an association between HbA1c and different clinical outcomes.
  • Table 6. Studies in dialysis patients with diabetes mellitus which did not find an association between HbA1c and different clinical outcomes.

References Powered by Scopus

The Effect of Intensive Treatment of Diabetes on the Development and Progression of Long-Term Complications in Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus

0
24006Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text
7056Citations
1803Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sturm, G., Lamina, C., Zitt, E., Lhotta, K., Haider, F., Neyer, U., & Kronenberg, F. (2011). Association of hba1c values with mortality and cardiovascular events in diabetic dialysis patients. the invor study and review of the literature. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020093

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

48%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

29%

Researcher 3

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 22

88%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

4%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

4%

Psychology 1

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free