Purpose: This study aimed at comparing short-term outcomes of patients who underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy and laparoscopic myomectomy. Methods: From January 2008 to August 2010, prospective data including 15 consecutive patients who underwent robotic-assisted myomectomy (RALM) with the da Vinci surgical system were recorded. These cases were compared with a retrospective cohort of 23 patients who underwent laparoscopic myomectomy (LM). Patient demographics, fibroid characteristics and peri-operative data (operative time, anesthesia time, set-up time, console time for robotic cohort, Estimated blood loss (EBL), length of hospital stay, conversion to laparotomy and operative complications were collected in both groups. Results: Mean operative time for the robotic group was 138.73 ± 39.51 min compared with 140.57 ± 38.17 min for the laparoscopy group (p = 0.887). No significant differences were noted between RALM versus LM for hospital stay (1.67 ± 0.58 vs. 1.87 ± 0.67 days, p = 0.369) and EBL (101.33 ± 39.84 vs. 119.78 ± 43.70 ml, p = 0.549). The numbers, size and location of myomas removed for two groups were similar. None of the cases in both groups required conversion to laparotomy. There were no significant intra-operative and post-operative complications in either group. Conclusion: RALM appears to provide the same surgical outcomes when compared with traditional laparoscopic myomectomy. © 2012 Springer-Verlag.
CITATION STYLE
Göçmen, A., Şanlikan, F., & Uçar, M. G. (2013). Comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy outcomes with laparoscopic myomectomy. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 287(1), 91–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-012-2530-0
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.