Hybrid Virtual- and Field Work-based Service Learning with Green Information Technology and Systems Projects

  • Branker K
  • Corbett J
  • Webster J
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Traditional engineering service learning (SL) projects can be classified as: 1) collaborations with a community group or non-profit organization to provide specific engineering around a community need, or 2) an internship-like experience with industry to address work requested by a client. The limitation of both traditional SL approaches is that they do not prepare students to implement unprescribed projects. In contrast, here students chose both the project and the partner for a self-directed engineering SL experience. This paper presents the findings of this novel pedagogical exercise in which students acted as change agents for industry by implementing unsolicited energy conservation measures (ECMs) focused on green information technology and systems (IT/S), in order to improve organizations’ environmental and economic performance. The hybrid SL projects had both ‘virtual’ and ‘real’ (field-work) SL components. For the virtual component, student teams developed and published on-line, open-source ECM calculators. For the field-work component, the teams self-selected industry clients and performed IT/S energy audits. Applicable ECMs were then selected and tailored, forming the basis of recommendations to the organizations. Results demonstrate the effectiveness of such hybrid engineering SL projects.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Branker, K., Corbett, J., Webster, J., & Pearce, J. M. (2010). Hybrid Virtual- and Field Work-based Service Learning with Green Information Technology and Systems Projects. International Journal for Service Learning in Engineering, Humanitarian Engineering and Social Entrepreneurship, 5(2), 44–59. https://doi.org/10.24908/ijsle.v5i2.3166

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

50%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

25%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

13%

Researcher 1

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 3

43%

Computer Science 2

29%

Physics and Astronomy 1

14%

Arts and Humanities 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free