Evaluation of Laboratory Management Based on a Combination of TOPSIS and RSR Methods: A Study in 7 Provincial Laboratories of China

7Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this study, a comprehensive evaluation of management for pathogenic microbiology laboratories is performed based on a combination of Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and Rank Sum Ratio (RSR) methods; in addition, the basis for improving laboratory management is provided. Using the laboratory evaluation tool developed by World Health Organization and a combination of TOPSIS and RSR methods, a system of evaluation indicators for the management of Chinese pathogenic microbiology laboratories is established for comprehensively evaluating the pathogenic microbiology laboratories of seven provincial Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The evaluation system includes 12 primary indicators and 37 secondary indicators. In terms of laboratory management, the seven laboratories were ranked as D, G, E, C, F, B, and A in descending order. None of these laboratories were evaluated as “good” or “poor.” One of the laboratories was marked as “relatively poor” (A), two as “medium” (B and F), and four as “relatively good” (C, E, G, and D). In this study, a method for evaluating laboratory management using the TOPSIS and RSR methods is proposed, and a basis for comprehensively evaluating laboratory management for pathogenic microbiology laboratories is provided to reflect management practices.

References Powered by Scopus

Early transmission dynamics in Wuhan, China, of novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia

11305Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Antigenic and genetic characteristics of swine-origin 2009 A(H1N1) influenza viruses circulating in humans

2150Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV): Announcement of the coronavirus study group

990Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Regional differences in health resource allocation: a longitudinal study in the Chengdu-Chongqing economic circle, China

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Evaluation of community basic public health service effect in a city in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region——based on entropy weight TOPSIS method and RSR fuzzy set

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Evaluation of inpatient services of tertiary comprehensive hospitals based on DRG payment

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhao, C., Liu, B., Li, J., Li, S., Liu, Y., Guo, Y., & Zhang, X. (2022). Evaluation of Laboratory Management Based on a Combination of TOPSIS and RSR Methods: A Study in 7 Provincial Laboratories of China. Frontiers in Public Health, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.883551

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Lecturer / Post doc 2

100%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

50%

Arts and Humanities 1

50%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free