Posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus in extremely low birth weight infants: Ommaya reservoir vs. ventriculoperitoneal shunt

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to analyze morbidity and initial surgery in infants with posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus (PHH) by comparing infants who were treated with a subcutaneous cerebrospinal fluid reservoir (Ommaya reservoir = CSF_R) with infants who primarily received a ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS). Method: Inclusion criteria were infants born between January 2006 and June 2014 who had a diagnosis of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) and underwent surgical intervention for hydrocephalus. Results: Twenty-five infants, with a median gestational age (GA) of 26.5 (28 ± 4) weeks and a median birth weight (BW) of 980 g (1205 ± 837), were included. The median umbilical artery pH (UApH) was 7.30 (7.20 ± 0.25). The median Apgar score at 10 min was 8 (7.4 ± 2). Twenty-five peri- and postnatal adverse events were encountered preoperatively. The IVH grades were grade II (n = 1), grade III (n = 17), grade IV (n = 6), and unknown grade (n = 1). Primary treatment consisted of CSF_R (n = 18) or VPS (n = 7) placement. There was a statistically significant difference between the postnatal ages of infants with CSF_R (32.5 days; 42 ± 28) and infants with VPS (163 days; 161 ± 18). Furthermore, we found a difference regarding GA but not BW between both groups. Arrest of PHH with shunt independence occurred in two infants from the CSF_R group (11 %). Conclusions: In the present study, early insertion of CSF_R allowed stabilization of the infants and thus postponement of permanent VPS insertion. However, in a subgroup of patients, PHH develops over a more prolonged course, and VPS insertion can be performed initially without the need for CSF_R.