Long-Term results of hybrid aortic arch repair using landing zone 0: A single-centre study

13Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has been gradually extended to the aortic arch region, with improved results. However, the rates of strokes and endoleaks in a hybrid TEVAR remain high. The goal of this study was to clarify the effectiveness of a hybrid TEVAR with a zone 0 landing using our treatment strategy. METHODS: From April 2008 to March 2020, a total of 102 patients were enrolled in this study, with a median follow-up period of 3.2 years. The procedures included total debranching TEVAR with graft replacement of the ascending aorta in 62 patients, total debranching TEVAR with ascending aorta banding in 19 patients and total debranching TEVAR without ascending aorta banding in 21 patients. RESULTS: Thirty-day mortality and hospital deaths were 1.0% (n = 1) and 3.9% (n = 4), respectively. The rates of aortic complications and endoleaks during the first 30 days postoperatively were 8.8% (n = 9) and 4.9% (n = 5), respectively. There was no type 1a endoleak, whereas retrograde type A dissection occurred in 2 (2.0%) patients. The rate of late aortic events was 3.9% (n = 4); there were no late endoleaks or aneurysm ruptures. The 10-year survival rate was 73.7% [95% confidence interval (CI) 60.3-83.8%]. The 10-year rates of aorta-related deaths and aortic events when performing a competitive-risk analysis were 29.4% (95% CI 16.3-42.5%) and 7.2 (95% CI 23.0-51.4%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Satisfactory early and long-Term results of a hybrid TEVAR with a zone 0 landing were achieved using our treatment strategy. When performing hybrid TEVAR in zone 0, postoperative aortic events may be reduced by accurate preoperative assessment of the ascending aorta.

References Powered by Scopus

Risk Factors for Perioperative Stroke After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair

202Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Have hybrid procedures replaced open aortic arch reconstruction in high-risk patients? A comparative study of elective open arch debranching with endovascular stent graft placement and conventional elective open total and distal aortic arch reconstruction

181Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Improving Results of Open Arch Replacement

179Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Comparison of the Outcomes of Total Endovascular Aortic Arch Repair Between Branched Endograft and Chimney Endograft Technique in Zone 0 Landing

15Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A meta-analysis on the effect of proximal landing zone location on stroke and mortality in thoracic endovascular aortic repair

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Open, endovascular or hybrid repair of aortic arch disease: narrative review of diverse strategies with diverse options

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kudo, T., Kuratani, T., Shimamura, K., Sakaniwa, R., & Sawa, Y. (2021). Long-Term results of hybrid aortic arch repair using landing zone 0: A single-centre study. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 59(6), 1227–1235. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezab016

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

67%

Researcher 2

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 5

63%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1

13%

Chemistry 1

13%

Engineering 1

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0