Effects of working memory load on empathic responses to narratives

0Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

When reading narratives, readers infer the emotions of characters and empathize with them. Emphathic responses can be parallel or reactive. This study, based on the dual-process theory, investigated which emotional responses (i.e., emotion inference, parallel response, or reactive response) in reading are caused by system 1 (unconscious, implicit, automatic, low-effort process) and which depend on system 2 (conscious, explicit, controlled, high-effort process). As cognitive load affects responses influenced by system 2, the effects of working memory load on reading were examined. Participants were divided into two groups based on working memory capacity, and instructed to read narratives under a dual-tasks situation similar to the reading span test. The results revealed no effect of cognitive load on inference of characters' emotions. However, additional load did affect both types of empathic responses in the low-capacity group. Further, when cognitive load was low, emotion inference correlated with both empathic responses. These results indicate that emotion inference is an automatic process, whereas empathic responses are controlled processes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fujiki, D., Wakasugi, Y., Kadono, S., Iwamoto, R., & Shimada, H. (2017). Effects of working memory load on empathic responses to narratives. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 88(4), 390–395. https://doi.org/10.4992/jjpsy.88.16334

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free