Efficacy of Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Monotherapy or Combinational Therapy in Patients Aged 75 Years or Older: A Study-Level Meta-Analysis

16Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Recent trials have shown a promising anti-tumor activity for advanced cancer patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors; however, little is known on the use of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in adults over 75 years of age. Here, we performed a study-level meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents between elderly (≥ 75 years) and non-elderly (< 75 years) patients. In the present study, we systematically reviewed phase 2/3 trials of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors of advanced solid tumors that reported treatment effect (hazard ratio [HR]) in patients based on age (≥ 75 years vs. < 75 years) and set anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy or combinational therapy as experimental arm. The HRs of OS and progression-free survival (PFS) are based on random-effect models. Overall, a total of eight qualifying trials comprising 5,393 subjects were included for meta-analysis, and 472 patients (8.8%) were aged 75 years or older. The overall estimated HR for OS was 0.70 (0.62–0.79) in patients < 75 years vs. 0.94 (0.67–1.30) in patients ≥ 75 years. Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents improved OS of melanoma patients in both elderly (HR 0.25 [0.10-0.60]) and non-elderly (HR 0.49 [0.33–0.71]) group. The OS difference in the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors between elderly and non-elderly patients was significant (P = 0.043 for interaction). The overall estimated HR for PFS was 0.77 (0.60–1.00) in patients < 75 years vs. 0.97 (0.60–1.58) in patients ≥ 75 years. Therefore, with the exception of melanoma, elderly patients (≥ 75 years) could not benefit from the anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents in survival, and toxicity profile of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 drugs should be explored in this population.

References Powered by Scopus

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration.

13973Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer

8085Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced squamous-cell non-small-cell lung cancer

7301Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in elderly patients: a meta-analysis and meta-regression

28Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Immune checkpoint expression and relationships to anti-PD-L1 immune checkpoint blockade cancer immunotherapy efficacy in aged versus young mice

13Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immunotherapy for the treatment of gynecologic cancer

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nie, R. C., Chen, G. M., Wang, Y., Zhou, J., Duan, J. L., Zhou, Z. W., & Yuan, S. Q. (2021, March 19). Efficacy of Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Monotherapy or Combinational Therapy in Patients Aged 75 Years or Older: A Study-Level Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Oncology. Frontiers Media S.A. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.538174

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

50%

Researcher 3

50%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 5

63%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 2

25%

Physics and Astronomy 1

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free