Study of the Psychometric Properties of the Diabetes Empowerment Scale Short Form (DES-SF)

9Citations
Citations of this article
55Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: The control of diabetes mellitus type 2 implies that people are actively engaged in self-care behaviours and self-efficacy is one of the variables involved in this process. Based on the Model of Behavioural Change, the Diabetes Empowerment Scale assesses the psychosocial self-efficacy of people with this disease. The aim of this study is to analyse the psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of the Diabetes Empowerment Scale (DES-SF), namely its reliability and validity. Method: A methodological nature study was conducted, with a convenience sample comprising 123 participants with diabetes mellitus type 2. In a primary health care context, the participants were asked to fill the DES-SF, the Diabetes Self-care Scale, and a sociodemographic and clinical questionnaire. Four weeks later and in order to evaluate stability over time, the self-efficacy scale was administered to a sub-sample comprised of 23 of these participants. Results: The study showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.83) and stability over time (r = 0.532, p = 0.009) of the DES-SF. The adjustment indices of the confirmatory factor analysis suggested the unidimensional nature of the scale. A positive association was found between self-efficacy and schooling (r = 0.209, p = 0.020), and self-care behaviours, in particular dietary (r = 0.221, p = 0.023) and physical exercise (r = 0.296, p = 0.002). Conclusion: Reliability and validity of the DES-SF was confirmed, which demonstrates its usefulness in the context of clinical practice or in research studies involving the Portuguese population.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sousa, M. R., Almeida, M., Loureiro, H., & Martins, T. (2020). Study of the Psychometric Properties of the Diabetes Empowerment Scale Short Form (DES-SF). Portuguese Journal of Public Health, 37(2–3), 66–72. https://doi.org/10.1159/000504629

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free