Increased risk of osteoporosis in patients with cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Both osteoporosis and cognitive impairment affect overall health in elderly individuals. This study aimed to investigate the association between cognitive impairment and the risk of osteoporosis. Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies on the association between osteoporosis and cognitive impairment from their inception until August 2023. The random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled risk ratio (RR) of osteoporosis in patients with cognitive impairment. Subgroup analysis was used to detect the sources of heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis was used to test the robustness of the pooled results. Funnel plots, Egger’s test, and Begg’s test were used to test publication bias. Results: Ten studies involving 9,872 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results showed that patients with cognitive impairment had an increased risk of osteoporosis (RR = 1.56, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.30–1.87, p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) are at 1.7-fold risk of osteoporosis compared with the control group (RR = 1.70, 95% CI: 1.23–2.37, p = 0.001), and sex, cognitive classification, study region, study design, and study quality might be the sources of heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis showed robustness of the pooled results. No significant publication bias was found (Begg’s test, p = 0.474; Egger’s test, p = 0.065). Conclusion: Current evidence suggests that patients with cognitive impairment are at increased risk of osteoporosis, especially patients with AD.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Xie, C., Wang, C., & Luo, H. (2023). Increased risk of osteoporosis in patients with cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Geriatrics, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-04548-z

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free