Interaction of exercise bioenergetics with pacing behavior predicts track distance running performance

24Citations
Citations of this article
77Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The best possible finishing time for a runner competing in distance track events can be estimated from their critical speed (CS) and the finite amount of energy that can be expended above CS (D0). During tactical races with variable pacing, the runner with the "best" combination of CS and D0 and, therefore, the fastest estimated finishing time prior to the race, does not always win. We hypothesized that final race finishing positions depend on the relationships between the pacing strategies used, the athletes' initial CS, and their instantaneous D0 (i.e., D0 balance) as the race unfolds. Using publicly available data from the 2017 International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) World Championships men's 5,000-m and 10,000-m races, race speed, CS, and D0 balance were calculated. The correlation between D0 balance and actual finishing positions was nonsignificant using start-line values but improved to R2 > 0.90 as both races progressed. The D0 balance with 400 m remaining was strongly associated with both final 400-m split time and proximity to the winner. Athletes who exhausted their D0 were unable to hold pace with the leaders, whereas a high D0 remaining enabled a fast final 400 m and a high finishing position. The D0 balance model was able to accurately predict finishing positions in both a "slow" 5,000-m and a "fast" 10,000-m race. These results indicate that although CS and D0 can characterize an athlete's performance capabilities prior to the start, the pacing strategy that optimizes D0 utilization significantly impacts the final race outcome.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kirby, B. S., Winn, B. J., Wilkins, B. W., & Jones, A. M. (2021). Interaction of exercise bioenergetics with pacing behavior predicts track distance running performance. Journal of Applied Physiology, 131(5), 1532–1542. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00223.2021

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free