Mortality in acromegaly: A 20-year follow-up study

125Citations
Citations of this article
82Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: It is unclear whether mortality still is increased in acromegaly and whether there are gender-related differences. We dynamically assessed outcome during long-term follow-up in our nationwide cohort. Patients and methods: We studied standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) relative to the general population and causes of death in acromegaly (n=333) compared with age- and gender-matched controls (n=4995). Results: During 20 (0-33) years follow-up, 113 (34%) patients (n=333, 52%women) and 1334 (27%) controls (n=4995) died (P=0.004). SMR (1.9, 95%CI: 1.53-2.34, P < 0.001) and all-cause mortality (OR 1.6, 95%CI: 1.2-2.2, P < 0.001) were increased in acromegaly. Overall distribution of causes of death (P < 0.001) differed between patients and controls but not cardiovascular (34%vs 33%) or cancer deaths (27%vs 27%). In acromegaly, but not in controls, causes of deaths shifted from 44%cardiovascular and 28%cancer deaths during the first decade, to 23%cardiovascular and 35%cancer deaths during the next two decades. In acromegaly, cancer deaths were mostly attributed to pancreatic adenocarcinoma (n=5), breast (n=4), lung (n=3) and colon (n=3) carcinoma. In acromegaly, men were younger than women at diagnosis (median 44.5 vs 50 years, P < 0.001) and death (67 vs 76 years, P=0.0015). Compared with controls, women (36%vs 25%, P < 0.01), but not men (31%vs 28%, P=0.44), had increased mortality. Conclusions: In acromegaly, men are younger at diagnosis and death than women. Compared with controls, mortality is increased during 20 years of follow-up, especially in women. Causes of deaths shift from predominantly cardiovascular to cancer deaths.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ritvonen, E., Löyttyniemi, E., Jaatinen, P., Ebeling, T., Moilanen, L., Nuutila, P., … Schalin-Jäntti, C. (2016). Mortality in acromegaly: A 20-year follow-up study. Endocrine-Related Cancer, 23(6), 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1530/ERC-16-0106

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free