The structure of the genotype–phenotype map strongly constrains the evolution of non-coding RNA

43Citations
Citations of this article
60Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The prevalence of neutral mutations implies that biological systems typically have many more genotypes than phenotypes. But, can the way that genotypes are distributed over phenotypes determine evolutionary outcomes? Answering such questions is difficult, in part because the number of genotypes can be hyper-astronomically large. By solving the genotype–phenotype (GP) map for RNA secondary structure (SS) for systems up to length L = 126 nucleotides (where the set of all possible RNA strands would weigh more than the mass of the visible universe), we show that the GP map strongly constrains the evolution of non-coding RNA (ncRNA). Simple random sampling over genotypes predicts the distribution of properties such as the mutational robustness or the number of stems per SS found in naturally occurring ncRNAwith surprising accuracy. Becausewe ignore natural selection, this strikingly close correspondence with the mapping suggests that structures allowing for functionality are easily discovered, despite the enormous size of the genetic spaces. The mapping is extremely biased: the majority of genotypes map to an exponentially small portion of the morphospace of all biophysically possible structures. Such strong constraints provide a nonadaptive explanation for the convergent evolution of structures such as the hammerhead ribozyme. These results present a particularly clear example of bias in the arrival of variation strongly shaping evolutionary outcomes and may be relevant to Mayr’s distinction between proximate and ultimate causes in evolutionary biology.

References Powered by Scopus

The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme

4878Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Non-coding RNA.

2093Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Fast folding and comparison of RNA secondary structures

1856Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Developmental bias and evolution: A regulatory network perspective

131Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Evolution in the light of fitness landscape theory

99Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Dance to the tune of life: Biological relativity

97Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dingle, K., Schaper, S., & Louis, A. A. (2015). The structure of the genotype–phenotype map strongly constrains the evolution of non-coding RNA. Interface Focus, 5(6). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2015.0053

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 23

57%

Researcher 10

25%

Professor / Associate Prof. 7

18%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20

48%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 13

31%

Physics and Astronomy 6

14%

Computer Science 3

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free